International Policies
The United States contributes nearly $1.5 billion annually
to international financial institutions to fund international development
programs. These funds are combined with the contributions of other
donor countries to provide tens of billions of dollars in assistance
in the form of grants, loans, and loan guarantees, to support economic
development, education, healthcare, and other anti-poverty programs.
The Financial Services Committee is responsible for oversight of U.S.
policy in these international institutions, which include the World
Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian and African Development
Banks, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Committee Democrats have emphasized the importance
of monetary and fiscal policies that promote low unemployment and solid
wage growth along with manageable inflation. The Committee’s
Democrats have also pointed to the need for a balanced and responsible
fiscal policy that foregoes budget-busting tax cuts for a wealthy few,
in favor of pro-growth investments in people and economic sectors.
Overseeing International Institutions
The Democratic Caucus of the Committee has actively
promoted important reforms in international institutions. Democratic-led
efforts include the landmark Enhanced Heavily-Indebted Poor Country
Initiative, which provides billions of dollars in debt forgiveness
to the world’s poorest countries. The Democratic Caucus has also
actively sought important reforms at the two largest international
financial institutions, the IMF and the World Bank, aimed at providing
greater transparency within the institutions, more interaction with
civil society, and a greater degree of focus in the missions of the
two institutions. Committee Democrats will continue to seek policies
and programs within the international financial institutions that are
aimed at reducing poverty, promoting the health and well-being of poor
people, and contributing to economic growth and stability globally.
Free Trade Agreements
Committee Democrats are also active in oversight of
trade negotiations related to the financial services and investment
provisions of trade agreements. They have opposed the Administration’s
efforts in recent negotiations, such as the U.S. trade agreements with
both Chile and Singapore, to severely restrict the ability of developing
countries to limit the destabilizing effects of volatile capital (“hot
money”) flows.