For Immediate Release: July 10, 2006
| Contact: |
Steve
Adamske (Frank), 202-225-7141
Bradley
Mascho (Gillmor), 202-226-4319
|
|
|
GILLMOR AND FRANK INTRODUCE BIPARTISAN
LEGISLATION TO CURB RETAILERS FROM BUYING ILCS
New legislation will bar
commercial firms from starting or purchasing specialized banks
Washington, DC-
Congressmen Paul E. Gillmor (R-OH) and Barney Frank (D-MA) today
introduced bipartisan legislation to close a loophole in the nation's
banking laws that allow retailers and other commercial firms to own
industrial loan companies (ILCs), also known as industrial banks. The
legislation is an outgrowth of Frank/Gillmor provisions which passed the
House both last year and in 2004 to prohibit commercially-owned ILCs from
gaining additional powers, including opening branches nationwide.
The "Industrial Bank
Holding Company Act of 2006," will enhance regulation of the parent
companies of industrial banks, restore the traditional separation between
banking and commerce, prevent branch banking by some commercially-owned
ILCs, prohibit the FDIC from granting new charters to commercial companies
seeking to start or acquire ILCs, and bolster the examination and
enforcement authorities of the FDIC as an ILC regulator. ILCs are
authorized in fewer than seven states, with most established in Utah. Due
to a loophole in the Bank Holding Company Act, they are eligible for
federal deposit insurance from the FDIC, but can be owned by commercial
firms, unlike other banks. Commercial firms are defined as those who
derive at least 15 percent of their revenue from activities that are
commercial. In addition, the parent companies are not subject to
supervision by the Federal Reserve as are bank holding companies, although
they are subject to some supervision by the FDIC.
Congressman Gillmor
said, "ILCs are being used by a few commercial companies to expand a
loophole big enough to drive a truck through. It should be obvious by now
that a large group of bipartisan Members of Congress has an interest in
addressing this growing problem and this bill is an important step towards
addressing the safety and soundness of our financial system. With a
historic number of pending ILC applications, Congress and the FDIC must
work together to craft regulations which retain the wall between banking
and commerce. We will accomplish this goal while giving the FDIC the
tools necessary to regulate the parents of the ILCs already in existence."
"The proliferation of
new ILC applications is creating a situation where Congress must set
appropriate policy to preserve the integrity of the banking system," said
Rep. Barney Frank, the Ranking Democratic Member on the House Financial
Services Committee.
On June 8, 2006, 98
Members of Congress wrote to the FDIC asking for a moratorium on new
approvals for new commercially-owned ILCs until Congress considers the
matter. To date, the Members have received no response from the FDIC.
In both the 108th and
109th Congress, the House overwhelmingly passed legislation that began to
address the ILC issue by restricting nationwide branching and prohibiting
certain commercially-owned ILCs from offering interest on business N.O.W.
accounts. To date, this approach has received no action in the Senate.
Currently five states have passed legislation that would effectively
prohibit commercially-owned ILCs from branching while an additional six
states have legislation pending that would address this issue.
Specifically, the Gillmor/Frank legislation
will do the following:
- Maintain the
necessary historic separation between banking and commerce, most
recently re-affirmed in Gramm-Leach-Bliley, by prohibiting new
commercially-owned ILCs effective June 1, 2006. This provision would
prohibit Wal-Mart, Home Depot and several other commercial firms from
chartering or acquiring an industrial bank.
- Require all
industrial bank holding companies to register with the FDIC and be
supervised in a similar fashion to the way holding companies are
supervised by the Federal Reserve.
- Address the concerns
of the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which in September of
2005 advised Congress to consider bolstering the authorities of the FDIC
at the consolidated holding company level.
- For some
commercially-owned ILCs, the bill would restrict expanded business plans
and branching across state lines. For example, Target Bank, chartered in
Utah in 2004, would be prohibited from branching into Ohio,
Massachusetts or some 20 states that would currently allow Target Bank
to branch.
- The activities of
ILCs chartered before October 1, 2003 are unaffected by the legislation.
However, this "grandfathered" exemption cannot be transferred to a new
owner.
Click here to
see a copy of H.R. 5746, the "Industrial Bank Holding Company Act of
2006".
###
The Committee oversees all components of the nation's housing and financial services
sectors including banking, insurance, real estate, public and assisted housing,
and securities. The Committee continually reviews the laws and programs relating
to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Reserve
Bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
and international development and finance agencies such as the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund. The Committee also ensures enforcement
of housing and consumer protection laws such as the U.S. Housing Act, the
Truth In Lending Act, the Housing and Community Development Act, the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Community
Reinvestment Act, and financial privacy laws.