Blog
Posted by
on
April 01, 2016
Posted by
on
February 29, 2016
7 photos from the Month of February: The Debt // Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen makes her first public comments since the Fed’s decision to raise interest rates and since the national debt eclipsed $19 trillion.
Posted by
on
February 16, 2016
The only problem was that no one would take a risk on Robert. He couldn't get a job. He couldn't get a loan. He couldn't even get a bank account. The deck was stacked against him. It was against these odds that Robert decided that if he was going to turn his life around, he needed to start his own business. Enter a local small dollar lender who understood Robert’s situation and designed a financial product to fit his needs. “The payday loan I got...was a lifeline,” said Robert. “It enabled me to start a business.”Robert understood the loan needed to be paid back. He understood how much it would cost. And he made a decision that was right for him. Today, Robert’s business employs 20 people and is still growing. He is a member of his local chamber of commerce and of the Better Business Bureau. He is a productive member of his community, but it all may have been for naught if he couldn’t access a small dollar loan. That’s why the CFPB’s attempt to shutdown small dollar lenders through regulatory fiat is so disturbing. It threatens to cut off the roughly 51 million American consumers who are unbanked or underbanked from accessing what may be the only type of credit available to them. What the CFPB is attempting is nothing less than a Washington power grab. It is decreasing consumer choice, increasing the cost of credit, and reducing credit availability to the most vulnerable Americans. If we promote more choices, then we can create more opportunities for low and moderate income Americans like Robert to rise up and build better lives for themselves. And if we don't -- if Washington is allowed to limit Americans' financial freedoms and choke off access to small dollar lenders -- then stories like Robert's will become a lot less likely. The consequences of this regulatory overreach are very real, as demonstrated by Robert’s response to a lawmaker who asked where he may be today if he hadn’t had access to the credit to start his small business:
Posted by
on
February 11, 2016
House Committee: Treasury Played Politics in Debt Ceiling Debate
Secret Fed Docs Show Obama Misled Congress, Public During Debt Limit Crises
Treasury sought to withhold plans on debt: Report "[E]mails from inside the New York Fed paint a picture of the Treasury as withholding information in order to gain leverage in the ongoing negotiations…Not everyone inside the New York Fed was happy with the Treasury's 'close hold' approach to the planning information. 'Agree the close hold here is crazy, counter-productive, and adds risk to an already risky situation,' wrote a New York Fed employee on Sept. 24, 2013."
"The stunning revelation could fundamentally change the battleground between Capitol Hill and the White House heading into the next debt showdown early next year, because it means a president could no longer use the threat of a full government shutdown to win a debt hike."
GOP investigation: Treasury misled Congress, public about the debt limit
Inside the Fed's `D-Day' War Games for Breach of U.S. Debt Limit "Republicans on the panel said the documents show that the Obama administration misled the public about contingency plans during recent debt-ceiling showdowns and obstructed a subsequent congressional probe into the matter."
Obama Lied, and the Debt Ceiling Died
The Obama Administration Misled Americans During the 2013 Debt-Ceiling Debate
Probe: Obama Admin, Treasury Dept. Misled Nation on Public Debt Limit Plan "One communication from the Federal Reserve was especially damning, saying, 'Treasury wants to maximize pressure on Congress by limiting communications about contingency planning.'
Subpoenaed Documents Reveal Obama Admin Deliberately Kept Congress in Dark Over Debt Ceiling Plans
House Report Says Treasury Secretary Misled Congress Over Debt Ceiling Risks
Posted by
on
January 12, 2016
2. Community banks and credit unions are thriving. 3. Too Big To Fail is a thing of the past. 4. Our regulatory system has been streamlined. 5. Median household income has risen. 6. Taxpayers will never have to bailout Wall Street again. 7. New business startups have increased.
Posted by
on
January 05, 2016
Not surprisingly, the new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) indicates an “increased compliance burden” among community banks and credit unions, which has “begun to adversely affect some lending activities, such as mortgage lending to customers not typically served by larger financial institutions…” Meaning that, once again, we see that this law supposedly intended to rein in Wall Street is hurting Americans on Main Street. And it’s not going to get better. As the GAO reports, “the full impact of the law remains uncertain” because the “array of new regulations” spewing forth from Dodd-Frank have yet to be finalized and fully implemented. Small hometown banks and credit unions tell the GAO the “trickledown effects” from this future “one-size-fits-all regulation” will fall on them. The GAO report comes on the heels of a similar study by the Dallas Federal Reserve, which concluded that in the onslaught of Dodd-Frank regulations “more banks may become too small to succeed.” The Financial Services Committee is working to change this. In 2015, 28 of our Committee bills were signed into law, including 6 dealing with Dodd-Frank. In 2016, we’ll be working to present visionary proposals laying out a better vision for financial reform – bold ideas that promote more opportunities for low and moderate-income Americans, protect taxpayers from future Wall Street bailouts, and empower families and individuals to achieve financial independence. You can join our efforts and track our progress by signing up for regular updates here.
Posted by
Staff
on
January 04, 2016
Read on Medium The report specifically warned of the consequences of the regulatory burden on small banks saying:
“Smaller community banks appear to have a valid concern that their compliance burden is rising and the playing field is becoming more uneven.” The report went on to say: “Regulatory oversight should match the level of risk an institution poses to the financial system and economy at large. Otherwise, more banks may become too small to succeed.” Translation? One-size-fits-all regulations do not work. And what’s worse is that it’s hurting community banks and credit unions and the hardworking Americans on Main Street who rely on them. The Financial Services Committee is working to change this. In 2015, 28 of our Committee bills were signed into law, including 6 dealing with Dodd-Frank. In 2016, we’ll be working to present visionary proposals laying out a better vision for financial reform – bold ideas that promote more opportunities for low and moderate-income Americans, protect taxpayers from future Wall Street bailouts, and empower families and individuals to achieve financial independence. You can join our efforts and track our progress by signing up for regular updates here.
Posted by
Staff
on
December 18, 2015
Subcommittee Questions CFPB's Consumer Data Collection Practice
On Wednesday the Financial Services Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee held a hearing to find answers regarding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) collection of consumer data. Subcommittee Chairman Sean Duffy (R-WI) warned, "We don’t know – and the American people don’t know – how much personally identifiable information the CFPB retains, how that data is protected and what the Bureau plans to do with all that data." The American Banker reported on Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick's (R-PA) concerns regarding ongoing data breaches and the vulnerability of consumer data at the hands of the CFPB. "Increasingly our cyber infrastructure and private records are becoming the target of both state and non-state actors alike." "For these reasons it is alarming that any organization… would collect any consumer data and store it in a single location like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau does," continued Rep. Fitzpatrick. The Hill quoted Rep. Mia Love's (R-UT) concern over lawmakers' casual treatment of data collection in its coverage of the hearing. "It is absolutely shocking to me the level of regulatory power these agencies have over the American people," she said. Chairman Hensarling Continues Call for Transparency at the Fed Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) responded to the Federal Reserve's interest rate hike with a continued call for more transparency at the Federal Reserve. Rep. Scott Tipton | Tipton questions agency’s handling of personal data Rep. Scott Tipton, R-Cortez, a member of the committee, questioned the witnesses about the claim that the CFPB did not collect any personal identifying information that could be compromised by pointing out that the agency collects identifying markers from consumers such as gender, age and ethnicity. Weekend Must Reads Boston Globe | New regulations: headache for bankers, boon for bank lawyers Talk to a community banker about the Dodd-Frank law and all the rules out of Washington as a result, and you’re bound to hear about the headaches. But the new rules have been a boon for these banks’ lawyers, the ones who are behind the scenes, assembling community bank mergers. Wall Street Journal | The Fed’s Uncertain Leap Forward Some uncertainty about future monetary policy is inevitable. The Fed has greatly added to that uncertainty by its decision to employ forward guidance rather than to follow a monetary rule. Unlike a rule, forward guidance reflects the thinking of policy makers today but does not bind them to action tomorrow. We have seen that play out through 2015. The chief effect of Wednesday’s action and accompanying statement is to once again increase uncertainty in financial markets. Morning Consult | The U.S. Department of Labor’s Misguided ‘Fiduciary’ Rule Both Democratic and Republican legislators have expressed concerns about proposed regulations from the Obama administration that will change the way Americans receive financial advice. The effect of these rules, if enacted as written, will be negative for savers in Northern Virginia as well as in the rest of the nation. They will disrupt an individual’s ability to access advice during the process of investment and retirement planning. On the Horizon Stay tuned! In the News
American Banker | Republicans Hammer CFPB Over Data Collection Efforts Washington Examiner | Gingrich goes after consumer data collection The Hill | Gingrich slams consumer protection panel's data collection Morning Consult | Newt Gingrich Brings Fireworks and Intrigue to CFPB Hearing Wall Street Journal | Republicans Push Proposal to Let Banks Get Back Money From Fed Politico Pro | Republicans gather support for Fed dividend change in omnibus DSNews | Do the CFPB’s Massive Data Collection Efforts Pose a Threat to Americans? New York Times | Fed Raises Key Interest Rate for First Time in Almost a Decade HousingWire | Moody’s: TRID Violations Found in 90% of Recently Reviewed Mortgages
Posted by
on
December 17, 2015
Unsustainably low rates didn’t solve the problem.
If they had, Americans wouldn’t be stuck in the slowest, worst-performing economic recovery of our lifetimes. Too many people are trapped in part-time work and more Americans than ever before have left the workforce all together. We can and must do better.
We need economically sustainable rates. The real question isn’t whether the Fed should be raising interest rates or lowering interest rates; it’s whether the rates are economically sustainable. Market-based interest rates are better for consumers, investors and our economy overall.
When the American market is whipped into a frenzy over whether or not the Fed will act, it hurts real Americans on Main Street. Fortunately, the House has passed a bipartisan measure to make the Fed more transparent and accountable than ever before. The Fed Oversight Reform and Modernization Act would expand opportunity by providing consumers, job creators and investors more confidence in making financial plans.
Posted by
Staff
on
December 11, 2015
Committee Passes Bipartisan Bills Aimed at Economic Growth and Consumer Protection
The Financial Services Committee on Wednesday approved several bipartisan bills designed to protect consumers, grow the economy and strengthen government transparency. The committee also voted to extend the Task Force to Investigate Terrorism Financing so it can continue examining how the U.S. can improve its ability to stem the flow of terrorist financing. Chairman Jeb Hensarling remarked, "I am proud that the Financial Services Committee continues to pass bipartisan legislation, all focused on the priorities of the American people. These bills can make a positive difference in people’s lives and help build a healthier economy with more opportunities for all. In addition, our Task Force to Investigate Terrorism Financing will continue its important work to fight the financial war against terrorists." To view the list of bills that passed, click here. Committee Questions FSOC Members on "Too Big to Fail" and Lack of Transparency The Committee also held an oversight hearing Wednesday on the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). Eight of FSOC’s 10 voting members appeared as witnesses. Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) said in his opening statement, "FSOC typifies not only the shadow regulatory system but also the unfair Washington system that Americans have come to fear and loathe: powerful government administrators, secretive government meetings, arbitrary rules, and unchecked power to punish or reward. Thus, oversight and reform is paramount." In its coverage of the hearing, Reuters reported that Republicans on the Committee criticized FSOC for being “secretive and unwilling to share information.” The American Banker reported that FSOC members “found themselves on the defensive that they were keeping lawmakers and the public in the dark about their activities.” "You need to become more like us -- more transparent, more open to the American public," Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) advised the witnesses. MEMBER SPOTLIGHT Rep. Frank Guinta | VIDEO: Guinta Bill Rebukes CFPB to Restore Discounts to Car Buyers New Hampshire Republican Rep. Frank Guinta (R.-N.H) sponsored a bill that would restore the ability of car dealers to offer discounts to car buyers out of the commission they earn from financing the purchase. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau banned the practice, claiming their was a potential for discrimination. Weekend Must Reads Charlotte Observer | Number of community banks keeps falling Nationwide, the number of traditional banks fell by more than 800 from 2007 through 2013. Most of that decrease was due to the dwindling number of community banks. As community banks consolidate, more market share is being concentrated in the hands of the nation’s biggest banks. Wall Street Journal | Shouting ‘Racism’ Is a Career Move A House Financial Services Committee investigation last week does a good job exposing the multiple dishonesties behind the CFPB’s crackdown on supposedly racist auto loans. The story’s most troubling aspect, though, is that Congress, not the press, took the lead in exposing it. Detroit News | Dodd-Frank slows small business growth Loans to small businesses are off sharply, down 38 percent since before the passage of the Dodd-Frank bill, which added layers of regulations on the financial industry. Wall Street Journal | The Consumer Bureau Cover-Up The Republican staff of the House Financial Services Committee has released a trove of documents showing that CFPB officials knew their information was flawed and even deliberated on ways to prevent people outside the bureau from learning how flawed it was. Investor's Business Daily | Hillary Clinton Doubles Down on Dodd-Frank’s Failure Clinton crows that her re-regulation plan has already won the “praise” of people like former Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank. What a persuasive endorsement. Frank, the former chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, announced on the eve of the crisis that he wanted to “roll the dice” on the housing market – which he did, losing bundles of taxpayer money. On the Horizon December 16, 2015 10:30 a.m.
Washington Examiner | GOP Will Offer Banking Reform Plan to Counter Obama’s Wall Street Journal | Hearing Brings New Test for the Financial Stability Oversight Council Politico Pro | FSOC's insurance member wants Dodd-Frank changes Politico Pro | Woodall in hot seat at FSOC hearing The Hill | GOP airs gripes to financial oversight panel Politico Pro | Financial Services Committee approves data security, public housing, investment reform bills Morning Consult | Top Finance Regulators Brace for Financial Services Showdown |